3 SFTP Alternatives to Securely Transfer Files

SFTP, or Secure File Transfer Protocol, is a commonly used method for securely transferring files over the internet. However, it is not the only option available. In this article, we will explore 5 alternative solutions to SFTP that can provide similar, or even greater, levels of security and functionality for transferring files. Whether you're a business looking to improve your file transfer processes or an individual in need of a secure way to share files, these alternatives offer a range of options to consider. From FTPS and SCP to RSYNC and WebDAV, and even cloud-based solutions, we'll break down the pros and cons of each option to help you make an informed decision about which file transfer method is best for your needs.

Alternative 1: Phalanx

It wouldn’t be a comparison of secure transfer solutions without mentioning Phalanx. Phalanx enables organizations to securely transfer files leveraging their existing cloud storage platforms like Google Drive, Dropbox, and OneDrive to transfer files, eliminating the need for a separate file transfer protocol. This allows businesses to continue using their other file features such as file syncing, collaboration, and easy file sharing, which is not available through traditional file transfer protocols like SFTP, FTPS, and SCP.

Phalanx as a file transfer solution

Phalanx provides an alternative way to transfer files over the internet without needing to set up servers or add another environment to your workplace. Phalanx automatically encrypts files individually so organizations can store and share files in the same way they would normally making secure file transfers simple. Secure files can be accessed through a web interface, and are compatible with a wide range of devices and operating systems, making it a convenient choice for both personal and business use.

Phalanx also allows for simple ways to securely transfer files, such as allowing secure links by right-clicking a file. This shareable link has a wide range of access control features that track who accesses your file, when it was accessed, and allows you to cancel or modify the link controls after the fact.

Utilizing a cloud-based file transfer solution like Phalanx also has the advantage of being highly scalable and easily accessible from anywhere, provided that you have an internet connection. It also often have an extra layer of security by providing encryption, multi-factor authentication and other security features to protect the data.

Phalanx is a convenient and easy-to-use alternative to traditional file transfer protocols, that offer additional features such as sharable links and existing cloud storage integrations. It has the advantage of being highly scalable, easily accessible from anywhere and provides an extra layer of security.

Pros and cons of using Phalanx for file transfer

There are several pros to using Phalanx for file transfer. One of the main advantages is the convenience and ease of use. Phalanx can be accessed through a web interface, and is compatible with a wide range of devices and operating systems, making it easy for individuals and businesses to share and transfer files. Additionally, Phalanx offers additional features such as sharable links, integrations to existing platforms, and easy file sharing any way that currently is being used, which is not available through traditional file transfer protocols like SFTP, FTPS, and SCP.

Another advantage of Phalanx is scalability. It can easily handle large amounts of data and accommodate growing storage needs since it integrates with organization's existing solutions. They also often have an extra layer of security by providing encryption, multi-factor authentication, and other security features to protect the data.

However, there are also some cons to consider when using a solution like Phalanx for file transfer. One potential drawback is the cost since there is a subscription fee associated with usage. Some of the alternatives can be implemented for free, but require technical implementation and maintenance.

Phalanx offers a convenient and easy-to-use alternative to traditional file transfer protocols, with additional features such as sharable secure links, integration to existing solutions, and easy file sharing. It also has the advantage of being highly scalable, easily accessible from anywhere, and provides an extra layer of security. However, it's important to consider there is a cost, which can be worth the investment for the ease-of-use provided by Phalanx.

Alternative 2: SCP

SCP (Secure Copy Protocol) is another option for securely transferring files over the internet. It is a simple and efficient protocol that uses SSH (Secure Shell) for secure data transfer. SCP provides a secure and reliable way to transfer files between two computers, and it's often used in Unix-based systems. Unlike SFTP, which is an extension of SSH and provides additional features such as file management, SCP is specifically designed for file transfer. In this section, we will explore the pros and cons of using SCP for file transfer and how it differs from SFTP and other file transfer protocols.

SCP and how it differs from SFTP

SCP (Secure Copy Protocol) is a simple and efficient protocol used for securely transferring files over the internet. It uses SSH (Secure Shell) for secure data transfer, providing a secure and reliable way to transfer files between two computers, and it's often used in Unix-based systems. SCP is a command-line tool, meaning that it is operated through terminal commands and it does not have a GUI (Graphical User Interface) like some other file transfer protocols.

SCP is similar to SFTP in that it uses SSH for secure data transfer, but it differs in the way it functions. Unlike SFTP, which is an extension of SSH and provides additional features such as file management, SCP is specifically designed for file transfer. It allows you to copy files between two computers, but it does not provide the same level of file management and manipulation capabilities as SFTP. Additionally, SCP is not as widely supported as SFTP, and it's less commonly used in non-Unix systems.

Another important difference between SCP and SFTP is that SCP is a command-line tool and it does not have a GUI (Graphical User Interface) like some other file transfer protocols. This can make it less user-friendly for those who are not familiar with the command line, but it can be more efficient for those who are familiar with it, and it can also be integrated with scripts and automated tasks.

In summary, SCP (Secure Copy Protocol) is a simple and efficient protocol used for securely transferring files over the internet. It uses SSH for secure data transfer and it's often used in Unix-based systems. It is similar to SFTP in that it uses SSH for secure data transfer, but it differs in the way it functions, it's specific to file transfer and it does not have the same level of file management and manipulation capabilities as SFTP. Additionally, it's less commonly used than SFTP, and it's less supported in non-Unix systems, but it's more efficient for those who are familiar with command-line interface.

Pros and cons of using SCP for file transfer

Using SCP for file transfer has several advantages. One of the main advantages is the security it provides. SCP uses SSH (Secure Shell) for secure data transfer, ensuring that files are transferred securely over the internet, protecting them from potential eavesdropping or tampering. Additionally, SCP is often used in Unix-based systems, making it a suitable option for organizations or individuals that are already using these systems.

Another advantage of SCP is that it is a command-line tool, meaning it can be integrated with scripts and automated tasks. This can make it more efficient for those who are familiar with the command line, and it also eliminates the need for a GUI (Graphical User Interface) which can be helpful for headless servers or remote machines.

SCP is also a lightweight protocol, it's simple and doesn't have a lot of features that you may not need, this can be beneficial in a scenario where the resources are limited and there's a need for a simple file transfer protocol.

However, there are also some cons to consider when using SCP for file transfer. One of the main disadvantages is that it is less commonly used than SFTP and less supported in non-Unix systems. Additionally, it does not provide the same level of file management and manipulation capabilities as SFTP. This means that it's less flexible and it's not suitable for some use cases that require more advanced file management features.

Another potential drawback is that it is a command-line tool and it can be less user-friendly for those who are not familiar with the command line. Additionally, it may require more expertise to set up, troubleshoot and maintain, which can be a challenge for some users.

Alternative 3: FTPS

FTPS, or File Transfer Protocol Secure, is a security extension to the commonly used FTP (File Transfer Protocol). It adds support for secure communications, allowing for the secure transfer of files over the internet. FTPS uses SSL or TLS to encrypt the connection, making it a more secure option than standard FTP. It is also backwards compatible, meaning it can work with older FTP clients. FTPS can be used with both explicit and implicit SSL/TLS. In explicit mode, the client establishes a secure connection with the server before sending files, while in implicit mode, the connection is secure from the start. It's important to note that FTPS is not the same as SFTP, which uses a different protocol. FTPS is an option for those looking for a secure FTP alternative.

FTPS and how it differs from SFTP

FTPS differs from SFTP in the way the connection is established and the protocol used for transferring files. SFTP (Secure File Transfer Protocol) uses SSH (Secure Shell) to establish a secure connection, while FTPS uses SSL or TLS. SFTP is also a newer protocol and is generally considered to be more secure than FTPS, as it provides stronger encryption and authentication methods. Additionally, SFTP allows for the use of public key authentication, while FTPS typically uses a password-based authentication.

Another important difference between FTPS and SFTP is that FTPS is based on the FTP protocol, which is an older protocol, whereas SFTP is based on the SSH protocol. FTP is not as secure as SSH and it has some security issues that SFTP doesn't have, such as the lack of secure login and the ability to encrypt data sent over the network.

In summary, FTPS is a secure extension of the standard FTP protocol and provides an additional layer of security through the use of SSL or TLS encryption. While it's considered more secure than standard FTP, it's not as secure as SFTP, which uses a different protocol and provides stronger encryption and authentication methods.

Pros and cons of using FTPS for file transfer

One of the main pros of using FTPS for file transfer is the increased security it provides compared to standard FTP. By using SSL or TLS encryption, FTPS ensures that files are transferred securely over the internet, protecting them from potential eavesdropping or tampering. Additionally, FTPS can be used with both explicit and implicit SSL/TLS, providing options for how the secure connection is established.

Another advantage of FTPS is that it is backwards compatible, meaning it can work with older FTP clients. This allows for a seamless transition for organizations or individuals currently using FTP, without the need to update or replace their existing software.

However, there are also some cons to consider when using FTPS for file transfer. One of the main disadvantages is that it is not as secure as SFTP, which uses a different protocol and provides stronger encryption and authentication methods. Additionally, FTPS typically uses a password-based authentication, while SFTP allows for the use of public key authentication, which is considered more secure.

Another issue with FTPS is that it is based on the FTP protocol, which is an older protocol and not as secure as SSH. It has some security issues that SFTP doesn't have, such as the lack of secure login.

In summary, FTPS provides an additional layer of security over standard FTP, but it's not as secure as SFTP. It's a good option for those who want to use a secure FTP alternative, but it's important to weigh the pros and cons of using it for file transfer depending on the specific use case and security requirements.

Learn About Secure File Transfers and More With Phalanx

To learn more about how Phalanx can help you securely transfer documents easily, contact us for a demo today.

‍